Skip to main content

Me or We? Part II

This is the fourth post in a series where we are making our way through Dr. Richard Gaffin's book, "By Faith, Not By Sight".
You can find  the first three linked here:
First Post Intro
Second Post
Third Post

The last post ended with the question, "How are we made right with God?".  It is your answer to this question that will help you make sense (or not) of the rest of our posts.

Men like N.T. Wright, E.P. Sanders and J.D.G. Dunn may argue that this is the wrong question to ask. (A helpful bibliography of some of these men's work is available in the book "By Faith, Not By Sight".) So it is necessary to dip our toe in these waters, in the most shallowest of ends, so that we can move forward a bit more prepared. We are only dipping our toes in because I don't think I have the theological chops to understand all of the complexities involved. But some familiarity is necessary. In order to hyper-metaphor you, we will do our best to avoid the theological weeds in this brief post.

N.T. Wright, in his book "What Saint Paul Really Said" (WSPRS) argues that Protestantism has gone off the gospel tracks. We have made the mistake of understanding what Paul meant by "the gospel" and "justification" through the eyes of Augustine in his debates with Pelagius. And if that wasn't bad enough, once Martin Luther took it to Erasmus, we went way off course in our understanding of Paul's understanding of the gospel and justification. (pg 113, WSPRS). It is not necessary to know the specifics of what Augustine and Pelagius and Luther and Erasmus were debating or to even be familiar with who these fellas were, but it would really be good, edifying reading.
What Wright encourages us to do instead of listening to these guys debate the issue of "justification" is to enter Paul's world. We must understand Paul as a converted Christian from Judaism living in the first century church if we are to understand what Paul really said about justification (pgs 20-23, 117, WSPRS). Focusing on how one is made right with God is not what justification is about according to Paul, Wright argues. Instead, in the context of the first century church, justification "...wasn't so much about soteriology as about ecclesiology; not so much about salvation as about the church." (pg 119 WSPRS)

Eschatalogy is the study of last things; what we are going to be, where we are going to be and how we are going to be transformed and how all of history is moving towards that point.

Soteriology is the study of salvation.

Ecclesiology is the study of the church.

So what Wright is saying is we have been using the wrong categories to understand what Paul says about justification. It isn't about individuals being saved (soteriology), but about God's people, the church, and their relationship to one another and God (ecclesiology).

Dr. Gaffin agrees that it is proper to discuss the church and the corporate aspect of Paul's writings, even regarding justification...because Paul does it (BFNBS, pg 3)! Dr. Gaffin will teach us that the Apostle Paul had a full and robust theology of justification (inspired by the Holy Spirit as Paul wrote) but not to the exclusion of the individual and definitive aspect of being made right with God through Jesus Christ.

We could go further, but we won't, because this is a blog, for Pete's sake. Pick up a book if you want to dive deep.  :-)   A really, really good place to start would be with this one. Don't want to stop there? Then order this one, and/or this one.
Be assured though, as we move forward, that the life and work and present reign of the Lord Jesus and your union in Him will be front-and-center and you, in Him, will be encouraged and your worship of Him will grow and deepen.


Popular posts from this blog

Election or Not, We Are United

I've probably lost my ever-loving mind posting on such an issue.

This has been, for many, a very contentious and discouraging election season. Families have been at odds, friends find themselves in pitched battles with one another and Facebook comments between Christians have seen an exceeding number of exclamation points and angry face emoticons.
However, regardless of the vote you cast and for whom, we should not be divided as friends, families and fellow Christians. Let me make my case by laying out four categories of voters (there are probably more, but work with me). These categories, in my view, are legitimate reasons to cast your vote (or not) for whoever you think you should cast your vote for.
If that is the case, Christian charity (patience, grace, love) compels us to understand one another.
It is an opportunity to listen to one another with humility. We may disagree, but that disagreement should not be a barrier in our relationship (or, even worse, destroy them).

I wi…

My Teachers

Ephesians 4:11-14

And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. (ESV)

In the last couple of months, I've heard of the death of a couple of influential professors. The tributes I read reminded me of how God has blessed His church with these men. I began to think about the teachers and professors who have influenced me.

And then I read a post recently from someone who graduated from Westminster Theological Seminary (WTS). What he wrote about WTS was foreign to me. He admitted it was based on "his experience" but it was full of char…

Rhythm and Rest

I was captivated by the election returns in November.

When I got home Tuesday night, November 8, I predicted to my family that the election would be over by 10pm, with the winner declared and a concession speech given no later than 11:00. I assumed Mrs. Clinton had it in the bag.

Ha!  I'm an idiot.

By 11:00pm my wife was in bed, my 17 year old daughter was fast asleep and my 14 year old daughter had fallen asleep on the couch (trying to stay up with me).  I couldn't peel myself away from the coverage.

As the night eased into the early morning hours, the rhythm of the night was favoring Donald Trump. I was captured. I had to see how it ended.

After watching Donald Trump give his first speech as President-elect I climbed into bed around 2:40 early that Wednesday morning. I'm 54 years old. I haven't seen 2:40am (on purpose) in years!

The day of work on Wednesday wouldn't wait.
I was up at 6:30.

I tackled the day in a fairly sluggish way.

The wacked out rhythm of elec…